MADDOG'S LAIR
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

While Hillary has the vapors over Trumps anti China bellicosity, Obama gets out in front with a 522% Chinese steel tariff

5/20/2016

Comments

 
America's Mistake Over Chinese Steel: Imposing Tariffs Makes Americans Poorer

Tariffs are a terrible idea for Americans, and they create the ground work for international conflict, and in the past have been sufficient reason for wars. 

​More below the fold.
"The U.S. has decided to impose import duties of some 500% on a certain type of Chinese steel and lesser amounts on some Japanese steel. This is not a good idea. The aim of having an economy is to make its citizens richer. Tariffs make consumers poorer. This is true even if we are talking about “anti-dumping” tariffs, “unfair” trade or even government subsidies. Imports are what make us richer and the cheaper we get them the richer we become."

So, we are protecting a few workers by forcing all consumers to pay more for steel? Why do politicians always sacrifice the little guy, for the connected industry, union, or wealthy with money enough to buy influence? This is the face of graft, and corruption, you pay, and the politicians friends (those who give him money) get the benefit. And we elect these people?

China is swimming in steel, among other products, and the Chinese economy is not in very good shape, so the CCP is willing to subsidize foreign sales to reduce political unrest.

"If Chinese steel mills try and sell us steel at a price we wish to pay for it, then why should the government try and tax either of us out of this mutually beneficial transaction?

US steel makers say that the Chinese government unfairly subsidises its steel exports. Meanwhile China has been under pressure to save its steel sector, which is suffering from over-capacity issues because of slowing demand at home.

China’s Ministry of Finance has not directly responded to the US ruling but on its website this morning it has said that China will maintain its tax rebate policy for steel exports as part of its efforts to help the bloated steel sector recover.

These tax rebates are seen as favourable policies to shore up ailing steel companies in China, and to avoid massive job losses. Expect more fiery rhetoric from the US on China’s unfair trading practices soon.

So what? The allegation is that the Chinese taxpayer is subsidizing that Chinese production and export of steel. That means, by definition, that the Chinese taxpayer is coughing up taxes to make the American consumer better off."

China made some colossal errors and now they have too much steel, so why should not US consumers benefit from this problem? It is beginning to look like the politicians are not interested in the little guy but instead they are interested in big steel, and big unions. The politicians argument that this is to protect the union workers is hogwash. The federal government could do that for far less cost to the consumer/taxpayer by simply providing some assistance to the steel workers until this glut resolves. But they do not even discuss this, instead, they seek to support the entire steel industry through tariffs. Could it be that their real interests are supporting big steel, and big union, and that the benefits accruing to the worker are incidental?

If not, why do the Clintons spend so much time selling influence to the wealthy, the connected, the big bankers, the big steel companies, the big unions? They could simply protect the little guy and not need to shake down these businesses. They have plenty of money, even without the influence peddling talks, er, speeches. 

Let's say Target decides to give customers a boost to the pocket book. It does so by requiring that all purchases be made in Target Bucks, which are exchanged at $1:1.25 Target Bucks, meaning that Target Bucks are worth 125% of $1, however, the price of every product in Target remains the same. So now customers can buy a product from Target for 1 Target buck, while the same product at another store would cost $1, but the Target Buck cost less than a dollar to purchase.

Let's say the customer has $100, at another store it will cost $100 to buy a product, but at Target, the customer uses $100 to buy 125 Target Bucks and uses 100 Target Buck to purchase the product, now the customer has 25 Target Bucks to spend on something else! This is an obviously good deal for the consumer. 

Applying this to our facts, it is shocking that the politician would want to penalize the American consumer for engaging in such a transaction with China. The politician should want this to happen, it will increase the Americans standard of living, yet the politician is hidebound to kill this, and take action which only benefits big steel, big union, and only incidentally, the steel worker.

This tariff will make American consumers poorer, while transferring money from them to these big businesses, and unions. 

"The point of an economy is to make the people in general richer. And imports do that. We get to consume those things which foreigners can produce better or cheaper than our fellow countrymen can. The fact that those foreigners are being subsidized by their home government to do this just increases the amount by which we are being made richer.

The only rational trade policy is one of unilateral free trade–no restrictions, duties or tariffs on any imports."

First thing we do, we kill all the crony politicians, at least metaphorically. This is little more than enriching the wealthy off the backs of all Americans.

​Again, this is the blue model in action, crushing the little guy, and giving the wealthy a boost.
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Author

    Maddog

      Blog Subscription

    Subscribe to Blog

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All
    1000-ways-to-die
    Abortion
    Amazon
    America
    Antisemitism
    Anti-semitism
    Bible
    Blogging
    Blue-model
    Book-links
    Booze
    Bus
    Cancer
    Children
    China
    China-ccp
    China-gdp
    China-ghost-cities
    China-ponzi
    Climate-change
    Coast-guardrescue-swimmer
    Cold-war
    Concealed-carry
    Constitution
    Cool-stuff
    Corruption
    Creative-destruction
    Crime
    Crisis-change
    Dead-guy-vote
    Dead-pool
    Death-of-the-pc
    Declaration-of-independence
    Deflation
    Democrat
    Demographic-decline
    Diet
    Earth-hour
    Ecommerce
    E-commerce
    Economic-change
    Economy
    Education
    End-of-history
    Energy
    Environmentalism
    Epa
    Eric-barker
    Europe
    Executive-outcomes
    F35
    Faith
    Family
    Fascists
    Financial-irresponsibility
    Financial-times
    Firearms
    First-world-problems
    Fitness
    Flight-to-security
    Food
    Fourth-turning
    Free-eye-exam
    French
    Funny
    Gdp
    Gdp-usa-vs-britain
    Gdp-usa-vs-germany
    Gdp-usa-vs-sweden
    Generational-theft
    Global-warming
    Government-incompetence
    Government-we-deserve
    Happiness
    Health
    Helicopter-parent
    Hell
    Holocene
    Honor
    Housing-affordability
    I-love-beaver
    Imf
    Immigration
    Independence-day
    Inefficiency
    Inflation
    Innovation
    Intelligence
    Intergenerational-conflict
    International-relations
    Investing
    Iran
    Iraq-war
    Islamic-reformation
    Italian-travel
    Japan
    Jodie-foster-effect
    Kayaking
    Keynesian-economist
    Kurdistan
    Law
    Leave-nato
    Leave-the-un
    Light-rail
    Maddog-story
    Marine
    Marriage
    Media
    Medical-insurance
    Medicine
    Middle-east
    Military
    Military-waste
    Money
    Monopoly
    Nanny-college
    News
    New-seasons
    Nirvana-is-another-name-for-hell
    North-korea
    Nukes
    Obama-doctrine
    Oil
    Oregon
    Organic
    Parenting
    Partition
    Pearl
    Pensions
    Peter-principle
    Police
    Politicians
    Portland
    Portlandia
    Portland-transit
    Predictions
    President-bush
    President-feckless-odither
    President-obama
    Psychology
    Race-huckster
    Rape
    Recession
    Recipe
    Replace-the-un
    Republican
    Research-studies-are-always-wrong
    Reviews
    Russia
    Salafism
    Sanctions
    Science
    Science-versus-faith
    Self-defense
    Self-drive-vehicle
    Sex
    Shale-oil
    Shia
    Sjw
    Sleeper
    Smart-growth
    Socialism
    Sovereignty
    Sport
    Sunni
    Supreme-court
    Syria
    Tax
    Technology
    Terrorism
    The-fed
    The-house-of-saud
    The-last-economic-superpower
    Therapy
    Trade
    Transit
    True-believer
    Tvfilm-review
    Un
    Union
    Urban-planning
    Urinals-of-note
    Venezuela
    Voter-fraud
    Wages
    Wahhabism
    War
    War-crimes
    Weird
    Weird-science
    Welfare
    Whole-foods
    Work



    RSS Feed

​Maddog's Lair is copyright 2016-2018 by Mark Sherman. Please feel free to quote from this site provided you link back to the original article.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact