MADDOG'S LAIR
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Most Research studies are false

8/23/2016

Comments

 
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

 I have been watching this since the mid 1970s, then through college, and finally as a litigation attorney litigating medical issues.

More below.
I decided to put together a few articles, and YouTube videos which point out the flaws in research, and make it clear that while the problem is acute in medical, lifestyle, and similar areas, it cuts across the board, and hits all areas of science. 

We know so much less than we think we know, mostly because so much of what we know is not so.

The following video is pretty good, it also pointed out to me that my stat skills are completely rusty! Mon Dieu! This surprised my although it should not have, since college is now +30 behind me.
How to Make More Published Research True

This is a potential answer, but obviously the real fix is a long way off. 

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" was a phrase made popular by Carl Sagan. However, Laplace writes: "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness."[1] Also, David Hume wrote in 1748: "A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence", and "No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact which it endeavors to establish."[2] and Marcello Truzzi says: "An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof."[3]
Either way, the phrase is central to scientific method, and a key issue for critical thinking, rational thought and skepticism everywhere."

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - RationalWiki

In the end, my point with all of this is that skepticism is always in vogue, and should be high on the shelf for everyone, and particularly when the data points to something new, novel, or incredible. 

While I am in no way a climate denier, I am deeply skeptical about many scientific research findings, including the fact that human released carbon is, or will have the alarming, catastrophic results claimed by the global climate alarmist. They have done little to prove their point, they have commonly withheld data, algorithms, and other information necessary to test their hypotheses, the models they rely on are poor, the data they rely on is commonly not the raw data but data altered, and they are commonly relying on a very small data set extending only from about 1850 - present. None of this is comforting, and instead is indicia of poor data, research, analysis, and reporting techniques. It is prima facie untrustworthy and requires a very high degree of proof to overcome, proof which is not present. 

Unfortunately, these poor techniques make it very difficult for non-scientists to simply take scientific findings at their face value. These problems are compounded when combined with bias, poor experimental structure, and the myriad other ways research can be accidentally, incompetently, or intentionally fudged. 

We stand at a place where we should be able to rely on the scientific findings reported, but we cannot. A primary driver of this is the top down journal/peer review system which is supposed to clarify, but which commonly obfuscates, with peer reviewers rubber stamping research which comports with their bias, or belief, and shunning other research regardless of value. 

Science stands in the dock, and needs to come to grips with the fact that it can lose the admiration, and trust of the people if it does not begin to cull the most obvious deadwood, and garbage. As we find more and more science less and less valuable, there is the potential for the Average Joe to simply begin to deny that science knows anything.

It is the problems with popular science like global warming, the massive, and shocking changes to medical procedures like the recommendation for PSA being suddenly withdrawn, and nearly all the prior advice regarding prostate exams being tossed under the bus. The fact that breast mammography is far less valuable than advertised, and the significant changes to these recommendations over the past many years. The constant fiddling with disease threshold levels causing reporting of massive increases in disease like stroke, high blood pressure among others which are actually only figments of the new definition, not changes in the actual amount of underlying disease. None of this results in trust. It instead appears as if the science is incompetent, and untrustworthy.   

I may craft inflammatory headlines, to grab attention, but my point is always skepticism, not science denialism. 

A few sites regarding science, and the problems:

Quackwatch

Retraction Watch - Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Author

    Maddog

      Blog Subscription

    Subscribe to Blog

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All
    1000-ways-to-die
    Abortion
    Amazon
    America
    Antisemitism
    Anti-semitism
    Bible
    Blogging
    Blue-model
    Book-links
    Booze
    Bus
    Cancer
    Children
    China
    China-ccp
    China-gdp
    China-ghost-cities
    China-ponzi
    Climate-change
    Coast-guardrescue-swimmer
    Cold-war
    Concealed-carry
    Constitution
    Cool-stuff
    Corruption
    Creative-destruction
    Crime
    Crisis-change
    Dead-guy-vote
    Dead-pool
    Death-of-the-pc
    Declaration-of-independence
    Deflation
    Democrat
    Demographic-decline
    Diet
    Earth-hour
    Ecommerce
    E-commerce
    Economic-change
    Economy
    Education
    End-of-history
    Energy
    Environmentalism
    Epa
    Eric-barker
    Europe
    Executive-outcomes
    F35
    Faith
    Family
    Fascists
    Financial-irresponsibility
    Financial-times
    Firearms
    First-world-problems
    Fitness
    Flight-to-security
    Food
    Fourth-turning
    Free-eye-exam
    French
    Funny
    Gdp
    Gdp-usa-vs-britain
    Gdp-usa-vs-germany
    Gdp-usa-vs-sweden
    Generational-theft
    Global-warming
    Government-incompetence
    Government-we-deserve
    Happiness
    Health
    Helicopter-parent
    Hell
    Holocene
    Honor
    Housing-affordability
    I-love-beaver
    Imf
    Immigration
    Independence-day
    Inefficiency
    Inflation
    Innovation
    Intelligence
    Intergenerational-conflict
    International-relations
    Investing
    Iran
    Iraq-war
    Islamic-reformation
    Italian-travel
    Japan
    Jodie-foster-effect
    Kayaking
    Keynesian-economist
    Kurdistan
    Law
    Leave-nato
    Leave-the-un
    Light-rail
    Maddog-story
    Marine
    Marriage
    Media
    Medical-insurance
    Medicine
    Middle-east
    Military
    Military-waste
    Money
    Monopoly
    Nanny-college
    News
    New-seasons
    Nirvana-is-another-name-for-hell
    North-korea
    Nukes
    Obama-doctrine
    Oil
    Oregon
    Organic
    Parenting
    Partition
    Pearl
    Pensions
    Peter-principle
    Police
    Politicians
    Portland
    Portlandia
    Portland-transit
    Predictions
    President-bush
    President-feckless-odither
    President-obama
    Psychology
    Race-huckster
    Rape
    Recession
    Recipe
    Replace-the-un
    Republican
    Research-studies-are-always-wrong
    Reviews
    Russia
    Salafism
    Sanctions
    Science
    Science-versus-faith
    Self-defense
    Self-drive-vehicle
    Sex
    Shale-oil
    Shia
    Sjw
    Sleeper
    Smart-growth
    Socialism
    Sovereignty
    Sport
    Sunni
    Supreme-court
    Syria
    Tax
    Technology
    Terrorism
    The-fed
    The-house-of-saud
    The-last-economic-superpower
    Therapy
    Trade
    Transit
    True-believer
    Tvfilm-review
    Un
    Union
    Urban-planning
    Urinals-of-note
    Venezuela
    Voter-fraud
    Wages
    Wahhabism
    War
    War-crimes
    Weird
    Weird-science
    Welfare
    Whole-foods
    Work



    RSS Feed

​Maddog's Lair is copyright 2016-2018 by Mark Sherman. Please feel free to quote from this site provided you link back to the original article.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact