Climate Persecution Theorist Peter Wadhams: The Book
These wackadoo theories place Wadhams in the same category as Hillary Clinton, and Brian Williams, deeply, and incomprehensibly insecure, and willing to lie to assuage their insecurities.
Wadhams insecurities obviously drive him to claim he is an assignation target. Right. Sorry Wadhams, you are less significant than a deer tick. Perhaps you can be annoying, but barely even that. Hillary, and Brian round out the examples here because they both took insignificant flights into locations where there was the potential for combat, and both lied about landing under fire, ohhhh, the daring duo, and their bravery.
"'I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.'
–Hillary Clinton, speech at George Washington University, March 17, 2008
Hillary Clinton has been regaling supporters on the campaign trail with hair-raising tales of a trip she made to Bosnia in March 1996. In her retelling, she was sent to places that her husband, President Bill Clinton, could not go because they were “too dangerous.” When her account was challenged by one of her traveling companions, the comedian Sinbad, she upped the ante and injected even more drama into the story. In a speech earlier this week, she talked about “landing under sniper fire” and running for safety with “our heads down.”
There are numerous problems with Clinton’s version of events."
Recalling Hillary Clinton’s claim of ‘landing under sniper fire’ in Bosnia
The problems are that Hillary was lying. The video footage of the event show the only danger faced was by the little girl reading a poem in english to Hillary. But the Big Bad Wolf, er, Hillary did not bite.
Williams suffers from the same problem and the same insecurities claiming in variations that either his helicopter or the one in front was shot at, or even hit by RPG fire. But alas, it was not so, a helicopter was hit in theater about 30 minutes before Williams flight, but Williams was nowhere near that helicopter.
Wikipedia might be a problematic source for politically charged issues, but it suffices here.
Brian Williams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I understand the desire to tell the "fish story" but there is a serious difference between telling such stories to family, and close friends, and telling the wide world of your alleged daring do. Further, it is one thing to have memory degregation over long periods of time, but none of these stories are that, all are stories told soon after the event in order to aggregate accolades for the yarn spinner. Telling a story from 40 years before will be embellished, human memory is not sufficient for most of us to form completely accurate recall. So, if told, some of the story will have to be filler. And most of these stories are told as stories, mostly true, but incomplete, and from faulty memory. Both the teller and listener understand this.
This is not the case with the story from a few years ago. If embellished, the story is a lie, and told with the intent to garner a benefit. The stories by Hillary, and Brian are both told as solidly factual stories, creating character where the individual has none, they were told for this purpose. They are self aggrandizing lies.
These people are never trustworthy. They lie for personal benefit. They must be treated as if everything they say is false, and then if some statement proves true, one should be amazed!
I just noticed this impressive bit of lying from Corbyn.
"Now, the revelation that Corbyn lied about being forced to sit on the floor of the train for the journey is one thing – those of us rather more cynical about this sort of thing are not remotely surprised." This is the pattern, insignificant event, blown out of proportion to inflate one's appearance, and to assuage one's inner insecurities. It is ugly, and leads us to not believe these people. We shouldn't.
Corbyn train stunt