New 2020 Candidate Pedro Promises To Make Nation's Wildest Dreams Come True
U.S.—Local high school student Pedro Sanchez has announced his 2020 run on a platform of offering the nation his protection and making everyone's wildest dreams come true. Sanchez's campaign manager, Mr. Dynamite, pointed out that he has a sweet bike, is really good at hooking up with chicks, and has a mustache. He also said everyone who votes for Pedro will be given a lanyard, signifying they are under the protection of Pedro. The candidate is also the only one running for president who has come out in favor of bringing more Holy Santos into the country to guard the nation and bring us good luck. "If you vote for me, all of your wildest dreams will come true," Pedro said, causing wild cheers to erupt from Democrats gathered in the high school auditorium where he announced his campaign. "Thank you." Democratic frontrunners quickly fired back, with Bernie Sanders saying he will make even your wildest dream to have 3 houses come true and Beto saying he was more authentically Hispanic than Sanchez. "Only I can make your wildest dreams come true," said Elizabeth Warren, hitting back. "Sanchez may have the Holy Santos and the support of the FFA, but I'm a Native American." She then performed an Indian rain dance, though it was quickly eclipsed by Dynamite's own dance routine, which received a standing ovation. Joe Biden would have responded to Sanchez's announcement but wasn't sure where he was or what year it was.
Comments
Australian: New Report: Electric Cars Have ‘Higher CO2 Emissions’ Worse yet, the gasoline auto will continue to improve MPG, and emissions while electric vehicles will not. Rick Manning: Trump Isolates China by Making Deals with the Rest of the World
And he acts directly and fearlessly. Trump will be one of the best Presidents in American history. Oregon to Become First State to Impose Statewide Rent Control
Rent control is an insidious mechanism which has destroyed many cities; only Oregon was stupid enough to apply it to an entire state! Rent control critics warn about eventual destruction of New York City Forget 1984, We're Facing A Brave New World
The problem is very real, but the solution is equally real - the blockchain internet. Average Americans are rebelling, which is why we have President Donald Trump. So are the people of many other nations, as are the nations of the EU rebelling at authoritarian EU leadership. I believe that as we get ever closer to our Brave New World, average Americans will be increasing repulsed by the model's destruction of individual liberty. In the end, we will simply tire of the authoritarian progressives attempt to make us serfs, and we will eventually go to war against the progressives to settle the issue. We will win, we always have, and I see no reason to believe we will not once again. We won in the American Revolution, a British civil war on American soil where we fought against authoritarian tyranny. We won in the American Civil War where we fought against the authoritarian Confederacy which wanted to make authoritarian slavery the law of the land. We won against the German National Socialists, the Italian Fascists, the Japanese authoritarians and their allies in WWII. To understand why we win read Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power. Those with liberty have much to lose personally for themselves, their family, and their friends. Those who wish to take liberty have little personal to gain; the gains go to the politically powerful and connected. One of these groups fights an existential fight, the other fights for a petty whim. This is why Elon Tesla has been able to kite his failed business. The credit markets need Junk loans to fund their economic needs. Tesla has been more than happy to help supply unrepayable junk paper in exchange for hard cash.
Who cares? I don't have a pension, do you? How could it affect me? Watch and learn. Schlichter: Get Ready For Apocalypse Ruth
"Progressives’ ghoulish glee over the death of an old man turned into barely constrained panic when, later that day, it was revealed that their heroine Ruth Bader Ginsberg was just treated for pancreatic cancer yet again. Their disgraceful joy at David Koch’s passing was yet another reminder of the harsh truth that leftists want you dead or enslaved. Koch’s sin was that he disagreed with liberals (though, in important ways, also with conservatives). For that, these cretins danced around like idiots celebrating his succumbing. And they’ll celebrate when you die too. Always believe people who tell you they hate you and want you dead. Oh, and never disarm." You dead, but only after they disarmed you, don't let them. "But she’s very old and she’s very sick and facing that reality is not the same as high-fiving it. There’s a more than significant chance that before the 2020 election she will pass on to her reward despite her being the Energizer Bunny of being wrong wrong wrong about constitutional jurisprudence. She just keeps going and going and going, but someday she’s going to run out of juice and join her pal Antonin Scalia on the bench in the great beyond, and if that happens with Trump in the White House, ho boy. You can relive the shameful saga of the Brett Kavanaugh hearings in Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino’s remarkable Justice on Trial. What will happen next time will pale in comparison. If you thought you saw frothy, mouth-foaming insanity last time -- just you wait." So, the entire nation will become Portlandia? Mon Dieu!!! My money is on him appointing Amy Coney Barrett, who has the unique ability to be a Scalia-like justice and to own the libs by being a woman. "And not just any woman but a female woman who has kids and goes to church and is down with originalism like a boss. It’s going to be hard to paint her as the ringleader of a teen rape gang, and while her beer-appreciation status is yet unknown, it is unlikely she will have to explain to the dummies on the Judiciary Committee her high school clique’s unique flatulence euphemisms. But they will still try to destroy her. That’s their only move, one not unrelated to the giddy cheer that greeted David Koch’s death. All we conservatives did with whoever Merrick Garland was was tell him “No.” But if you are conservative and you oppose them, they will try to wipe you out, if not literally then at least figuratively. But that’s a desperation tactic and it does not work, not if you hold strong and refuse to back down. Clarence Thomas fought back and won. Brett Kavanaugh fought back and won. And Amy Coney Barrett will fight back and she will win. And that means our Constitution will win." Well, that makes it all better! Bannon believes we will have a shooting war in the South China Sea, but that the Middle East is a near equal inflection point. I have questions whether the war will be foreign or a third American civil war. The first was the American Revolutionary War. My mind quakes but the worst outcome would be both. The Great Failure Of The Climate Models "Should we trust these computer models of doom? Let’s find out by comparing the actual temperatures since 1979 with what the 32 families of climate models used in the latest U.N. report on climate science predicted they would be. Atmospheric scientist John Christy developed a global temperature record of the lower atmosphere using highly accurate satellite soundings. NASA honored him for this achievement, and he was an author for a previous edition of the U.N. report. He told a House Science Committee hearing in March 2017 that the U.N. climate models have failed badly. Christy compared the average model projections since 1979 to the most reliable observations — those made by satellites and weather balloons over the vast tropics. The result? In the upper levels of the lower atmosphere, the models predicted seven times as much warming as has been observed. Overprediction also occurred at all other levels. Christy recently concluded that, on average, the projected heating by the models is three times what has been observed. This is a critical error. Getting the tropical climate right is essential to understanding climate worldwide. Most of the atmospheric moisture originates in the tropical ocean, and the difference between surface and upper atmospheric temperature determines how much of the moisture rises into the atmosphere. That’s important. Most of earth’s agriculture is dependent upon the transfer of moisture from the tropics to temperate regions. Christy is not looking at surface temperatures, as measured by thermometers at weather stations. Instead, he is looking at temperatures measured from calibrated thermistors carried by weather balloons and data from satellites. Why didn’t he simply look down here, where we all live? Because the records of the surface temperatures have been badly compromised. Globally averaged thermometers show two periods of warming since 1900: a half-degree from natural causes in the first half of the 20th century, before there was an increase in industrial carbon dioxide that was enough to produce it, and another half-degree in the last quarter of the century. The latest U.N. science compendium asserts that the latter half-degree is at least half manmade. But the thermometer records showed that the warming stopped from 2000 to 2014. Until they didn’t. In two of the four global surface series, data were adjusted in two ways that wiped out the “pause” that had been observed. The first adjustment changed how the temperature of the ocean surface is calculated, by replacing satellite data with drifting buoys and temperatures in ships’ water intake. The size of the ship determines how deep the intake tube is, and steel ships warm up tremendously under sunny, hot conditions. The buoy temperatures, which are measured by precise electronic thermistors, were adjusted upwards to match the questionable ship data. Given that the buoy network became more extensive during the pause, that’s guaranteed to put some artificial warming in the data. The second big adjustment was over the Arctic Ocean, where there aren’t any weather stations. In this revision, temperatures were estimated from nearby land stations. This runs afoul of basic physics. Even in warm summers, there’s plenty of ice over much of the Arctic Ocean. Now, for example, when the sea ice is nearing its annual minimum, it still extends part way down Greenland’s east coast. As long as the ice-water mix is well-stirred (like a glass of ice water), the surface temperature stays at the freezing point until all the ice melts. So, extending land readings over the Arctic Ocean adds nonexistent warming to the record. Further, both global and United States data have been frequently adjusted. There is nothing scientifically wrong with adjusting data to correct for changes in the way temperatures are observed and for changes in the thermometers. But each serial adjustment has tended to make the early years colder, which increases the warming trend. That’s wildly improbable. In addition, thermometers are housed in standardized instrument shelters, which are to be kept a specified shade of white. Shelters in poorer countries are not repainted as often, and darker stations absorb more of the sun’s energy. It’s no surprise that poor tropical countries show the largest warming from this effect. All this is to say that the weather balloon and satellite temperatures used in Christy’s testimony are the best data we have, and they show that the U.N.’s climate models just aren’t ready for prime time." Trust only after repeated verifications. |
AuthorMaddog Categories
All
|