MADDOG'S LAIR
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Aaron Renn on Silicone Valley and the Logic of the Global economy. 

7/19/2016

Comments

 
Silicon Valley and the Logic of the Globalized Economy | Newgeography.com

This is an excellent look at how, and why modern US tech companies are so productive, profitable, and able to pay such high wages.

More after the break.
 It is clear that this model cannot be extended outwards to very many other industries. This model requires a very streamlined number of employees, with nearly direct access to markets, and customers. An industry like grocery, or retail is far more clogged with people, making it difficult, or perhaps, impossible to achieve the density of high quality, highly dedicated employees, or the high profits necessary to pay such people. 

This could change radically with the introduction of robots. 

This is also a uniquely American model, or perhaps more accurately, an Anglospheric model. This model relies primarily on traits like willingness to hard work, grit, dedication, and perseverance. It also requires that each employee be very close to autonomous, making independent decisions for the good of the company without direct input from superiors. 

This model is somewhat scalable to European countries, but not particularly scalable to Asian countries like China. The problem with the model in Europe is that Europeans do not want to work hard for high pay. This is primarily because they are taxed so much that they receive only a small additional benefit from the large amount of additional work. The reward system in Europe favors only working to a moderate level. In addition, there is a strong social culture demanding one month off during the summer, extensive vacation time during the rest of the year, myriad "national" holidays, and stiff limits on hours worked. There are also significant problems with delegating responsibility.

The European system retains strong vestiges of feudal aristocracy, and delegating responsibility sufficient to meet the Silicone Valley model is untenable. I remember seeing a graph recently which showed this nicely. Essentially it showed that the European earning at the 95% level only had the spendable cash of a worker earning at the 45% level in the US. With nicely showed that Europeans in the upper middle class live to US middle class standards, middle class to lower middle class, and lower middle class to near US poverty standards. Only the lowest 5% in Europe lived at or slightly above their US equivalent.

Asia has a problem with the idea of autonomy, and individual responsibility. Long working hours are not the problem. Workers in Asia more resemble worker bees, with decisions made only at the higher levels, and tasks executed only at the lower levels. The model used in Asia utilizes an employee dense model, and appears to be as much an employment scheme, as business/profit model. This looks more like our grocery/retail model, although less efficient. 

Renn notes the difficulty of workers maintaining this high level of performance. I agree with him, for most it is difficult, and perhaps impossible to continue at this level year after year. I do not think that lower IQ individuals cannot perform at sufficiently high levels, but I do not believe they can do so for long periods of time. The demands are simply too great. 

I am surprised that Renn did not integrate some analysis of the gig/sharing economy into his analysis. One thing which seems to be happening in the US is that this gig economy allows all individuals to participate in highly productive employment in an ad hoc manner. This allows the high achievers to perform for longer at higher pay, and the lower achievers, and those who do not wish to work for long at highly productive levels, to work in spurts with substantial breaks between work sessions. 

Such a model would be more scalable to Europe. This could be called the gig/sharing/collaborative work model. The problem again for Asia is the fact that responsibility must be delegated far down the employment chain, and these cultures are uncomfortable with this. I suspect the highly productive Asian countries will be able to work around this model and find something which works. In China, however, I cannot see how the culture could be stretched to make this work. The CCP will certainly not be friendly to such a model.

Anyway, this is an interesting article and it deserves your attention. 

Your thoughts and comments would be welcomed.
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Author

    Maddog

      Blog Subscription

    Subscribe to Blog

    Categories

    All
    1000-ways-to-die
    Abortion
    Amazon
    America
    Antisemitism
    Anti-semitism
    Bible
    Blogging
    Blue-model
    Book-links
    Booze
    Bus
    Cancer
    Children
    China
    China-ccp
    China-gdp
    China-ghost-cities
    China-ponzi
    Climate-change
    Coast-guardrescue-swimmer
    Cold-war
    Concealed-carry
    Constitution
    Cool-stuff
    Corruption
    Creative-destruction
    Crime
    Crisis-change
    Dead-guy-vote
    Dead-pool
    Death-of-the-pc
    Declaration-of-independence
    Deflation
    Democrat
    Demographic-decline
    Diet
    Earth-hour
    Ecommerce
    E-commerce
    Economic-change
    Economy
    Education
    End-of-history
    Energy
    Environmentalism
    Epa
    Eric-barker
    Europe
    Executive-outcomes
    F35
    Faith
    Family
    Fascists
    Financial-irresponsibility
    Financial-times
    Firearms
    First-world-problems
    Fitness
    Flight-to-security
    Food
    Fourth-turning
    Free-eye-exam
    French
    Funny
    Gdp
    Gdp-usa-vs-britain
    Gdp-usa-vs-germany
    Gdp-usa-vs-sweden
    Generational-theft
    Global-warming
    Government-incompetence
    Government-we-deserve
    Happiness
    Health
    Helicopter-parent
    Hell
    Holocene
    Honor
    Housing-affordability
    I-love-beaver
    Imf
    Immigration
    Independence-day
    Inefficiency
    Inflation
    Innovation
    Intelligence
    Intergenerational-conflict
    International-relations
    Investing
    Iran
    Iraq-war
    Islamic-reformation
    Italian-travel
    Japan
    Jodie-foster-effect
    Kayaking
    Keynesian-economist
    Kurdistan
    Law
    Leave-nato
    Leave-the-un
    Light-rail
    Maddog-story
    Marine
    Marriage
    Media
    Medical-insurance
    Medicine
    Middle-east
    Military
    Military-waste
    Money
    Monopoly
    Nanny-college
    News
    New-seasons
    Nirvana-is-another-name-for-hell
    North-korea
    Nukes
    Obama-doctrine
    Oil
    Oregon
    Organic
    Parenting
    Partition
    Pearl
    Pensions
    Peter-principle
    Police
    Politicians
    Portland
    Portlandia
    Portland-transit
    Predictions
    President-bush
    President-feckless-odither
    President-obama
    Psychology
    Race-huckster
    Rape
    Recession
    Recipe
    Replace-the-un
    Republican
    Research-studies-are-always-wrong
    Reviews
    Russia
    Salafism
    Sanctions
    Science
    Science-versus-faith
    Self-defense
    Self-drive-vehicle
    Sex
    Shale-oil
    Shia
    Sjw
    Sleeper
    Smart-growth
    Socialism
    Sovereignty
    Sport
    Sunni
    Supreme-court
    Syria
    Tax
    Technology
    Terrorism
    The-fed
    The-house-of-saud
    The-last-economic-superpower
    Therapy
    Trade
    Transit
    True-believer
    Tvfilm-review
    Un
    Union
    Urban-planning
    Urinals-of-note
    Venezuela
    Voter-fraud
    Wages
    Wahhabism
    War
    War-crimes
    Weird
    Weird-science
    Welfare
    Whole-foods
    Work



    RSS Feed

​Maddog's Lair is copyright 2016-2018 by Mark Sherman. Please feel free to quote from this site provided you link back to the original article.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact