MADDOG'S LAIR
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

The difference between Trump's restraint and the Democrats' incitement

1/12/2021

Comments

 
Incitement To Mob Violence, Acceptable Versus Unacceptable Forms — Manhattan Contrarian

"In case you were wondering, the Manhattan Contrarian hereby condemns mob violence without qualification, and whether coming from the left or right side of the political spectrum.  

Until this past week, I had actually been quite impressed at the ongoing restraint of Trump supporters and others on the right for not having responded in kind to the hundreds of violent riots across the country perpetrated during 2020 by Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and numerous other groups on the progressive left.  The assault on the U.S. Capitol building on Wednesday was a huge unforced error by those who crossed the line into lawbreaking and violence.

I would have thought that the Democrats who had condoned and encouraged mob violence for months on end would have been too embarrassed to speak out against this rare transgression by their opponents.  But of course, that’s not the way this works.  The New York Times, having spent months downplaying and dismissing mob violence from Antifa and BLM as “mostly peaceful protests,” had this on its front page on Thursday January 7:
IMG_0723.jpg
By Friday January 8, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had had her team draw up a new draft article of impeachment against the President.  The draft accuses the President of “incitement of insurrection” and “willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States.”

According to the draft article, the alleged “incitement” occurred on the afternoon of January 6, during a speech that the President made addressed to supporters who had assembled in Washington.  It was several hours after that speech that the violence erupted, and the Capitol building was breeched.  

It occurred to me that it would be worthwhile looking at the text of that speech to see how it compares to various statements made by prominent Democrats and leftists that might also be characterized as incitement to violence.  Ann Althouse on January 8 helpfully went through a transcript of Trump’s speech and picked out the statements that she characterized as “the most violent.”  You can decide for yourself whether in fact they are “violent” at all.  

In the list below, I have included what I think are the six most concerning statements from Trump’s speech.  And then I have mixed in various statements from prominent Democrats and progressives with regard to leftist mob violence.  See if you can tell which are which:

“Make the phone calls, send the emails, show up.  You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there’s unrest in our lives.” 
“We’re going walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”
“I believe injustice is a threat to the safety of all people. Because once you have a group that is marginalized . . . they have no choice but to riot.”
“We will not let them silence your voices.”
“[W]e’re going to have somebody in there that should not be in there and our country will be destroyed, and we’re not going to stand for that.”
“And everyone beware, because they’re [violent protests] not gonna stop….They’re not gonna let up.  And they should not.  And we should not.”
“We will never give up. We will never concede, it doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
“I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country, and maybe there will be. . . .”
“We’re not going to let it happen.”
“The cries for peace will rain down, and when they do, they will land on deaf ears, because your violence has brought this resistance. We have the right to fight back!”
“Together we are determined to defend and preserve government of the people, by the people and for the people.”
Answers below the fold.

Quote 1:  Democrat Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, on MSNBC, August 15, 2020 — a time when violent riots were occurring around the country,.

Quote 2:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Quote 3:   Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez during a July 2020 radio interview with New York’s Hot 97 radio station. 

Quote 4:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Quote 5:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Quote 6:  Incoming Vice President Kamala Harris on Stephen Colbert show, August 28, 2020. 

Quote 7:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Quote 8:  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a 2018 interview, discussing the issue of family separation at the southern border.

Quote 9:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Quote 10:  Ex-NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick in a tweet on May 28, 2020.  A few days later (June 3) Twitter’s Jack Dorsey announced that he was giving Kaepernick $3 million.  

Quote 11:  Trump at the January 6 speech.

Do Trump’s statements really appear to be more of an “incitement to violence” than the statements of Pressley, Ocasio-Cortez, Pelosi and Harris?  Not from anything I can find in the words.  You just have to understand that there is good mob violence and bad mob violence.  It all depends whether the rioters on on our side.  

UPDATE, January 11:  I thought I might do readers a favor and read all the way through that NYT article with the headline “Trump Incites Mob,” to see if they ever quote any words that constitute the supposed “incitement.”In the whole very long article, the entirety of direct quotation from Trump’s pre-riot speech is found in this one paragraph:

“‘We will never concede,’ he told a group of thousands gathered near the White House, inveighing against members of his own party preparing to finalize his loss as ‘weak Republicans’ whose leadership had gone ‘down the tubes.’  He then repeatedly told them to march to the Capitol where the vote tallying was about to get underway.  The violence began a little more than two hours later.”

In other words, they couldn’t find anything that remotely constituted “incitement,” but they ran with that gigantic headline anyway.  Shameful."
Comments
comments powered by Disqus

    Author

    Maddog

      Blog Subscription

    Subscribe to Blog

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016

    Categories

    All
    1000-ways-to-die
    Abortion
    Amazon
    America
    Antisemitism
    Anti-semitism
    Bible
    Blogging
    Blue-model
    Book-links
    Booze
    Bus
    Cancer
    Children
    China
    China-ccp
    China-gdp
    China-ghost-cities
    China-ponzi
    Climate-change
    Coast-guardrescue-swimmer
    Cold-war
    Concealed-carry
    Constitution
    Cool-stuff
    Corruption
    Creative-destruction
    Crime
    Crisis-change
    Dead-guy-vote
    Dead-pool
    Death-of-the-pc
    Declaration-of-independence
    Deflation
    Democrat
    Demographic-decline
    Diet
    Earth-hour
    Ecommerce
    E-commerce
    Economic-change
    Economy
    Education
    End-of-history
    Energy
    Environmentalism
    Epa
    Eric-barker
    Europe
    Executive-outcomes
    F35
    Faith
    Family
    Fascists
    Financial-irresponsibility
    Financial-times
    Firearms
    First-world-problems
    Fitness
    Flight-to-security
    Food
    Fourth-turning
    Free-eye-exam
    French
    Funny
    Gdp
    Gdp-usa-vs-britain
    Gdp-usa-vs-germany
    Gdp-usa-vs-sweden
    Generational-theft
    Global-warming
    Government-incompetence
    Government-we-deserve
    Happiness
    Health
    Helicopter-parent
    Hell
    Holocene
    Honor
    Housing-affordability
    I-love-beaver
    Imf
    Immigration
    Independence-day
    Inefficiency
    Inflation
    Innovation
    Intelligence
    Intergenerational-conflict
    International-relations
    Investing
    Iran
    Iraq-war
    Islamic-reformation
    Italian-travel
    Japan
    Jodie-foster-effect
    Kayaking
    Keynesian-economist
    Kurdistan
    Law
    Leave-nato
    Leave-the-un
    Light-rail
    Maddog-story
    Marine
    Marriage
    Media
    Medical-insurance
    Medicine
    Middle-east
    Military
    Military-waste
    Money
    Monopoly
    Nanny-college
    News
    New-seasons
    Nirvana-is-another-name-for-hell
    North-korea
    Nukes
    Obama-doctrine
    Oil
    Oregon
    Organic
    Parenting
    Partition
    Pearl
    Pensions
    Peter-principle
    Police
    Politicians
    Portland
    Portlandia
    Portland-transit
    Predictions
    President-bush
    President-feckless-odither
    President-obama
    Psychology
    Race-huckster
    Rape
    Recession
    Recipe
    Replace-the-un
    Republican
    Research-studies-are-always-wrong
    Reviews
    Russia
    Salafism
    Sanctions
    Science
    Science-versus-faith
    Self-defense
    Self-drive-vehicle
    Sex
    Shale-oil
    Shia
    Sjw
    Sleeper
    Smart-growth
    Socialism
    Sovereignty
    Sport
    Sunni
    Supreme-court
    Syria
    Tax
    Technology
    Terrorism
    The-fed
    The-house-of-saud
    The-last-economic-superpower
    Therapy
    Trade
    Transit
    True-believer
    Tvfilm-review
    Un
    Union
    Urban-planning
    Urinals-of-note
    Venezuela
    Voter-fraud
    Wages
    Wahhabism
    War
    War-crimes
    Weird
    Weird-science
    Welfare
    Whole-foods
    Work



    RSS Feed

​Maddog's Lair is copyright 2016-2018 by Mark Sherman. Please feel free to quote from this site provided you link back to the original article.
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact